Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 07:37
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why do Democrats claim to be Americans when they are actually Globalists?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
The Ultimate Visual Guide to Protein: Here's How Much You Should Eat A Day - CNET
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Unde non omnis quia ut et magni ea.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Are there any queer Space Marine Legion in Warhammer 30k or 40k?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
PlayStation Plus new free game is the service's first 'AAAA' - GAMINGbible
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Chip Supplier Wolfspeed Agrees to Cut $4.6 Billion Debt in Bankruptcy - WSJ
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Hailee Steinfeld & Josh Allen marry in west coast ceremony - Buffalo Rumblings